Dr Milind Tayade
Published in Issue II, July 2013
“I regard the Buddha’s Dhamma to be the best. No religion can be compared to it.” – Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar
“It was not with an empty mind that I went to the Buddha at that early age.” The question is being asked to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar that “Why Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar inclined towards Buddhism?” Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar has answered this question in the book “The Buddha and His Dhamma” preface. He says “the year I passed the English Fourth Standard Examination, the people of my community wanted to celebrate the occasion by holding a public meeting to congratulate me. The meeting was held and Dada Keluskar presided. He gave me as gift a copy of his book on the life of the Buddha. Babasaheb was greatly impressed and moved by it.
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar also said that “I had a background in reading the Buddhist lore and I could always compare and contrast”. That is also why Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar proudly and confidently said “It was not with an empty mind that I went to the Buddha at that early age. This is the origin of my interest in the Buddha and his Dhamma. This conviction has grown in me after thirty-five years of close study of all religions.”
We go through the detailed preface of Buddha and his Dhamma –
Original Preface of The Buddha and His Dhamma
“A question is always asked to me, how I happen to take such a high degree of education. Another question is being asked, why I am inclined towards Buddhism. These questions are asked because I was born in the community known in India as the ‘Untouchables’. This preface is not the place for answering the first question. But this preface may be the place for answering the second question.
The direct answer to this question is that I regard the Buddha’s Dhamma to be the best. No religion can be compared to it. If a modern man who knows science must have a religion, the only religion he can have is the Religion of the Buddha. This conviction has grown in me after thirty-five years of close study of all religions.
How I was led to study Buddhism is another story. It may be interesting for the readers to know. This is how it happened.
My father was a military officer but at the same time a very religious person. He brought me up under a strict discipline. From my early age, I found certain contradictions in my father’s religious way of life. He was a Kabirpanthi though his father was Ramanandi. As such, he did not believe in Murti Puja (Idol Worship) and yet he performed Ganapati puja, of course for our sake, but I did not like it. He read the books of his Panth. At the same time he compelled me and my elder brother to read every day before going to bed a portion of Mahabharata and Ramayana to my sisters and other persons who assembled at my father’s house to hear the Katha. This went on for a long number of years.
The year I passed the English Fourth Standard Examination my community people wanted to celebrate the occasion by holding a public meeting to congratulate me. Compared to the state of education in other communities this was hardly an occasion for celebration. But it was felt by the organizers that as I was the first boy in my community to reach this stage. They thought that I had reached a great height. They went to my father to ask for his permission. My father flatly refused saying such a thing would inflate the boy. After all, he has only passed an examination and done nothing more. Those who wanted to celebrate the event were greatly disappointed. They, however, did not give way. They went to Dada Keluskar, a personal friend of my father, and asked him to intervene. He agreed. After a little argumentation, my father yielded and the meeting was held. Dada Keluskar presided. He was a literary person of his time. At the end of his address, he gave me as a gift a copy of his book on the life of the Buddha, which he had written for the Baroda Sayajirao Oriental Series. I read the book with great interest and was greatly impressed and moved by it.
I began to ask why my father did not introduce us to the Buddhist Literature. After this, I was determined to ask my father this question. One day I did. I asked my father why he insisted upon our reading the Mahabharata and Ramayana which recounted the greatness of the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas, and repeated the stories of the degradation of the Shudras and the Untouchables. My father did not like the question. He merely said. “You must not ask such silly questions. You are only boy; you must do as you are told.” My father was a Roman Patriarch and exercised most extensive Patria Protests over his children. I alone could take a little liberty with his and that was because my mother had died in my childhood leaving me to the care of my aunty. So after some time, I asked again the same question. This time, my father had evidently prepared himself for a reply. He said, “The reason why I ask you to read the Mahabharata and Ramayana is this. We belong to the Untouchables and you are likely to develop an inferiority complex which is natural. The value of Mahabharata and Ramayana lies in removing this inferiority complex. See Drona and Karna. They were small men but to what heights they rose? Look at Valmiki . He was a koli. But he became the author of Ramayana. It is for removing this inferiority complex that I ask you to read the Mahabharata and Ramayana.” I could see that there was some force in my father’s argument. But I was not satisfied. I told my father that I did not like any of the figures in Mahabharata. I said, “I do not like Bhishma, and Drona nor Krishna. Bhishma and Drona were hypocrites. They said one thing and did quite the opposite. Krishna believed in fraud. His life is nothing but a series of frauds. Equal dislike I have for Rama. Examine his conduct in the Sarupnakha episode, in the Vali Sugriva episode and his beastly behaviour towards Sita.” My father was silent and made no reply. He knew that there was a revolt.
This is how I turned to the Buddha with the help of the book given to me by Dada Keluskar. It was not with an empty mind that I went to the Buddha at that early age. I had a background and in reading the Buddhist Lore I could always compare and contrast. This is the origin of my interest in the Buddha and his Dhamma.
The urge to write this book has a different origin. In 1951, the Editor of the Mahabodhi Society’s Journal of Calcutta asked me to write an article for the Vaishak Number. In that article, I argued that the Buddha’s Religion was the only religion which a society awakened by science could accept and without which it would perish. I also pointed out that, for the modern world, Buddhism was the only religion which it must have to save itself. That Buddhism makes slow advance is due to the fact that its literature is so vast that no one can read the whole of it. That it has no such thing as a Bible, as the Christians have, is its greatest handicap. On the publication of this article I received many calls written and oral to write such a book. It is in response to these calls that I have undertaken the task.
To disarm all criticism I would like to make it clear that I claim no originality for the book. It is a compilation and assembly plant. The material has been gathered from various books. I would particularly like to mention “Ashavaghosha’s Buddhadhavita” whose poetry no one can excel. In the narrative of certain events, I have borrowed his language.
The only originality that I can claim in the order of presentation of the topics in which I have tried to introduce simplicity and clarity. There are certain matters which give headache to the student of Buddhism; I have dealt with them in the introduction.
It remains for me to express my gratitude to those who have been helpful to me. I am very grateful to Mr. Nanak Chand Rattu of village Sakrulli and Mr. Prakash Chand of village Nangal Khurd in the district of Hoshiarpur (Punjab) for the burden they have taken upon themselves to type out the manuscript. They have done it several times. Shri Nanak Chand Rattu took special pains and put in very hard labour in accomplishing this great task. He did the whole work of typing, etc. very willingly and without caring for his health and any sort of remuneration. Both Mr. Nanak Chand Rattu and Mr. Prakash Chand did their job as a token of their greatest love and affection towards me. Their labour can hardly be repaid. I am very much grateful to them.
When I took up the task of composing the book, I was ill and am still ill. During these five years there were many ups and downs in my health. At some stages, my condition had become so critical that doctors talked of me as a dying flame. The successful rekindling of this dying flame is due to the medical skill of my wife and Dr. Malvankar, the Physician who has been attending me. I am immensely grateful to them. They alone have helped me to complete the work. I am also thankful to Mr. M. B. Chitnis, who took special interest in correcting proof and to go through the whole book.
I may mention that this is one of the three books which will form a set for the proper understanding of Buddhism. The other two books are:-
(i) Buddha and Karl Marx, and
(ii) Revolution and counter revolution in ancient India.
They are written out in parts. I hope to publish them soon.” – B. R. Ambedkar.